Athée Canadien
The Bible’s unlikely ally
By rebekah
The King James Bible will celebrate its 400th birthday later this year, and to commemorate the occasion, Richard Dawkins wrote an op-ed where he praised this particular version of the Bible as literature:
Let’s celebrate the 400th anniversary of this astonishing piece of English literature. … Warts and all, let’s encourage our schools to bring this precious English heritage to all our children, whatever their background, not as history, not as science and not (oh, please not) as morality. But as literature.
I find that many nonbelievers are divided over the issue of religious literacy — you’ve got some (like me) who think it’s important to have a certain level of knowledge of religious ideology/dogma/literature in order to combat it. But there are others, I’ve found, who would just as soon discard anything having to do with religion, and think that paying *any* attention to it is the same as condoning it. 
As I’ve mentioned, I’m more of the persuasion that you need to know your opponent, so I often advocate for a certain degree of religious literacy — for Christianity, that means knowing something about the Bible.
One book that I found that gives a pretty entertaining overview of the Bible is the book Biblical Literacy: The Essential Bible Stories Everyone Needs to Know by Timothy Beal. If you were fortunate to escape the binds (and flannelgraphs) of Sunday School growing up, this book helps to give a quick overview of some of the more important stories of the Bible — plus it also helps to give context to many of the everyday sayings we have in our culture today, that come straight from “the good book.”
| Print article | This entry was posted by rebekah on January 5, 2011 at 12:11 pm, and is filed under Atheism, Education. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed. |
Comments are closed.

about 1 year ago
I’ve never met anyone who thinks that being biblically literate is a betrayal of all things atheist, but then again most of my friends aren’t Atheists so who knows.
If you throw out the Bible, you have to throw out the Iliad and Herman Hesse’s Siddhartha, not to mention Milton’s Paradise Lost which is the primeval example of an epic English poem. Talk about throwing the baby out with the bathwater… But maybe we can convince the Gideons to put copies of those in hotel rooms instead. Or maybe a couple of issues of Hustler.
about 1 year ago
As an atheist who grew up mostly secular, no sunday school or church at all really, I did most of my bible studies during my time getting my English Lit undergrad. It wasn’t indoctrination, just research. I even took a religious studies course. This wasn’t required, but very necessary. When you are studying the history of English lit, not knowing the bible is a huge problem, from Chaucer to Shakespeare to the more modern stuff. There are so many references both direct and indirect, you just can’t get by without it. I still have the first Gideon bible I ever snagged from a hotel room, and its still full of yellow postits.
As to reading the bible, the translations done by protestants brought the bible to the people in a way the old catholic church refused to do. Actually showing people what is in that book is a great way to demystify it, and push people towards being more critical.
about 1 year ago
I try to justify all of those wasted hours learning the bible by how awesome I am at the biblical questions in Jeopardy. ;)
Kidding aside, I have to agree with Joe in that a basic knowledge of the bible is important when trying to understand many references in English literature. This is true of Greek myth and also Norse myth to a lesser extent. I don’t know many people that are offended by the idea of learning other ancient mythologies, I see no problem in treating Christian mythology the same way. I plan on teaching the bible to my children alongside other fables and fairy tales.
about 1 year ago
I have several versions of the Bible right beside my Homer and Ovid. It’s cultural literacy in the first place; we should be aware of the major influences on the development of our society. But secondly, if my kids don’t know all those stories and ideas, how well will they be inoculated against the ideas raised by those young men in suits on the street corner? They have to know what they’re talking about to defeat those arguments presented with missionary zeal.