Athée Canadien
Secular nations have no business outlawing online poker
By Guest
By: Michael Bell
The rise of religious conservatism across North America has resulted in an increasingly harsh stance on gambling – especially online poker. In April of this year, the United States government cracked down on some of the largest online poker companies in the world, using flimsy legal justification for what was obviously an attack on the freedom to choose one’s own values, regardless of what the dominant religion of the country may be. (Read more here about the legal arguments involved.) Americans who chose to gamble were punished – the money they had tied up in the affected online poker sites was confiscated by the Department of Justice, and tens of thousands of people lost their main source of income, their careers, and their livelihoods. Professional online poker players who chose to make a career doing what they loved, by doing what they excelled at, were in effect punished for not subscribing to dominant Christian values.
In a nation where gambling is viewed as a sin – a sin so obvious and unquestionable that creating a law to forbid it seems as natural as outlawing theft or murder – by the majority, the minority is denied the right to arrive at its own conclusions. Those who saw no moral conflict in gambling, those who saw no problem with enjoying a game that also allowed them to support their families, were in effect invalidated by a conservative law strongly influenced by religion. Atheists in America are expected to conform to the dominant conservative belief system, which is enforced by law instead of by personal choice. Where is the personal liberty and freedom that Americans claim to hold so dear?
We face a similar situation in Canada as well. While online poker has not been completely outlawed on a federal level, it remains ambiguous and in a legal grey area that politicians lack the courage to clarify. By seeking to officially legalize online gambling in general and online poker in particular, public officials risk alienating the conservative religious folk who adamantly refuse to accept that people have a right to choose how they spend their free time. They believe gambling is a sin, and therefore no one should be allowed to participate in it, period. Where is the logic in that?
A secular nation, as both the U.S. and Canada claim to be, has no place policing its citizens based on illogical religious values. Banning theft makes sense – stealing harms society by jeopardizing trust and cooperation between neighbors and communities. Banning murder makes sense as well, for much the same reason – it jeopardizes our ability to live together in peace. But banning gambling, a quiet activity that brings joy to many peaceful, productive citizens’ lives – that makes no sense at all to those who reject antiquated religious values. Atheists in Canada have as much right to gamble and play online poker in their spare time as religious Canadians do to read the Bible when they’re not busy. Atheists may not see the point of such an activity, and they may even think it could be potentially harmful to the person engaging in it, but it’s not their place to tell another person what he or she can and can’t do based on personal convictions. Yet in a world increasingly populated with fundamentalists of all stripes around the globe, this message of tolerance is sure to be lost.
Michael Bell lives in London and Toronto, Ontario. He is a poker player, copywriter and SEO. He sometimes writes for poker.ca and several other Canadian gambling resources and doesn’t like any superior authority to limit his freedom of choice.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Guest on December 1, 2011 at 11:54 am, and is filed under Politics. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed. |
Comments are closed.

about 2 months ago
Amen Brother!
about 2 months ago
I’m a happily secular, atheist, humanist, liberal skeptic, the whole package. I have no moral issues with gambling. I do, however, have other issues with it. It’s addictive and exploitative, for starters. It damages people, it damages families. Not just conservative Christian families. Just because a nation is secular (ideally) doesn’t mean it should have no community standards. If online poker were to shrivel up and float away, I would be just fine with that.
about 2 months ago
I think you are oversimplifying this. Gambling can be an addictive behavior, and as such, it is not simply a choice. As such, regulating and/or banning it, especially in certain contexts is perfectly legitimate from my entirely atheistic point of view.
Civilization has at is basis, the regulating of dangerous behavior. Gambling can be, and the internet provides few control mechanisms for abuse.
about 2 months ago
…it’s not their place to tell another person what he or she can and can’t do based on personal convictions.
I think your position here almost reduces to moral relativism. If there are moral certainties, or at least some things that are better than others, than I have to agree more with rgdaniel on this one. Michael de Dora has a great discussion of this legislating morality on his blog Rationally Speaking. Basically he argues that morality can, is, and should be legislated.
about 2 months ago
I’m guessing its more ‘libertarianism’ than relativism.
about 2 months ago
I agree with the other commentors that it is not necessarily only religion driving laws against gambling.
But as a liberal I am sympathetic to your view and think prohibition is too nanny statish for me. I could live with some regulation but an all out ban is offensive to personal freedom.
about 2 months ago
Uh this has nothing to do with religious conservatives…. The reason why online gambling is continually attacked (and more so in the US) is due to the casino lobby which as you might know has a ton of money. This has more to do with Casino’s in with government taking out the competition then it does with religious conservatives..
about 2 months ago
Gambling is illegal here in mainland China, and it’s a fair bet that the reasons (whatever they may be) don’t have anything to do with religion. In Western countries, it’s quite possible that Christian moralising, concerns about addiction and (as Steve mentions) lobbying by the casino-based gaming industry all reinforce each other as sources of opposition to online poker. It doesn’t have to be just one thing.
For what it’s worth, my preferences on this issue are similar to KC’s – regulation, maybe, but not prohibition. It’s a bit academic for me, though, since my interest in any form of gambling is pretty much nil.
about 2 months ago
All of you said the right things. Gambling should regulated. And maybe even that gambling should be prohibited for people that have issues with it. But addictive gamblers are only 5% of all. I think that the reason why gambling is so tightly regulated is the mix of C. Sullivan idea and that of Steve: politicians are robbing gambling providers in North America, and are using Christian concept of sin to justify their action against gambling. Why not just to prohibit gambling for those addicts in the same way driving license is held in cases when people are abusing driving law regulations. We have a lot of speed addicts. Yet, car driving isn’t considered to be a sin…
about 2 months ago
All people that expresses their opinions here are right. The problem is that our society’ having a lot of addicts of speed driving, didn’t outlawed cars. Why should it outlaw poker? American and Canadian politician are robbing providers by implementing Christian and general Judaic concept of sin. The masses of people are supporting anyone who says that he is about to protect their soul. It an abuse of religious values as well as those of democracy.
about 2 months ago
Comparing a game of chance to a vehicle is absurd.
And casinos do exist in canada.
And again, I don’t see any need to resort to religion for justification for controlling gambling. If the Casino closed on sundays… I’d certainly see a reason to object, although not a huge one. Gambling is not a right, nor a necessity, at best its a leisure activity, and for most its a waste of money.
about 2 months ago
IPhones are waste of money, restaurants are waste of money, cosmetics is waste of money, alcohol is waste of money, private cars are waste of money. All of those are leisures. All of them were created to trick people to give away their money. And casinos do exist in Canada in several areas and only people who have helicopter can gamble there. Gambling is banned on religious grounds, because it’s the only source where politics can’t continuously get money, because of loosing the status of nation’s shepherds of superior morality. THis morality is based on Christian values. Pagans never saw gambling as negative activity – the opposite. Gambling had sacral status.
about 2 months ago
Well, if its ok with ‘the pagans’, I guess you got me there. Lol. I prefer to rely on science and logic. But that’s my religious bias showing, I guess.
about 2 months ago
Joe, when you rely on Logic to prohibit something to other people, it means that Logic is either fascism or religion…))