“On Political Suicide”

On Tuesday 18, November 2014 people who have expressed interest in Civil Rights in Public Education Inc. (CRIPE) received this message:

On Political Suicide

 

Some people, when asked for their opinion on the abolition of the public funding of the Roman Catholic separate school system, have said they thought such a move would be political suicide. Their reason seemed to be “because there are enough Roman Catholics in the province to throw out a government if one dared to do so.”

 

However, all evidence that I can find leads to the opposite conclusion.

 

1) Having a policy of supporting separate school funding did not get the Liberals or the NDP elected when Bill Davis was premier. . . .

 

2) After Bill Davis made separate school funding part of the Progressive Conservative platform for 1985, the next election reduced his party to a minority and the next election put the PCs in the political basement until 1995. Why didn’t this policy result in overwhelming support from the Roman Catholics?

 

3) Going back further, despite intense lobbying by the Roman Catholic church, Wilfred Laurier, a Quebecer and a Roman Catholic, when in opposition, spoke against a remedial bill in the federal Parliament to force Manitoba to reinstate the publicly-funded Roman Catholic separate school system which Manitoba abolished in 1890. The next year Laurier was Prime Minister. Why didn’t the RCs punish him for not forcing Manitoba to return public funding to the RC separate schools? Laurier did not commit political suicide through his non-support of publicly-funded Roman Catholic schools in Manitoba.

 

4) Despite an intense campaign by the Roman Catholic Church in Newfoundland to defeat the proposed school reforms in a referendum, the vote in St. John’s, with a majority of Roman Catholic residents, was more in favour of the reforms than the provincial average.

 

5) Despite an intense lobbying campaign by the Roman Catholic church of MPs, and despite a Roman Catholic Prime Minister, and despite a free vote allowed by the federal government, the constitutional changes for Newfoundland were passed by an overwhelming vote of 171 to 41. No political party committed suicide in the process.

 

6) On a political talk show in early January of 1997, Premier Brian Tobin of Newfoundland and his two opposition leaders were questioned. On the topic of the school referendum to abolish church control of education, Tobin was asked: “Did you check with the RC church on this?” Tobin’s reply went something like this: “When I campaigned for election as Premier, I campaigned to represent all the people of Newfoundland and not the RC church. I am a Roman Catholic and so are my two colleagues, but we all supported the reform of the Newfoundland school system.” There was no political suicide.

 

7) Through submissions to the Estates General in Quebec with regard to the abolition of the denominational school system in Quebec, 67% of Quebecois agreed and 88% wanted community schools notwithstanding the religion of the parents. The Association of Quebec Bishops also agreed it was time for change. There are no longer any publicly-funded Roman Catholic schools in Quebec – and no political party committed suicide in the process.

 

8) The only very evident and acknowledged political suicide where religion is concerned, was the political suicide of Bill Davis and his progressive Conservative government when he added the public funding of the Roman Catholic separate school system to PC policy. That political suicide put the PCs into the political basement for 10 long years.

 

9) If anyone has an example of a political party committing suicide as a result of that party instituting any policy which removes Roman Catholic privilege, saves the government over a $ billion every year, and finally comes in compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, I would be pleased to be informed.

2 thoughts on ““On Political Suicide”

  1. I think you will find that Roman Catholics are more likely to accept public education when they are in the majority. When they are in the minority, or even in a balanced demographic, they seem to feel more threatened.

    South Ireland versus North Ireland is a case in point.

    Even that horrible mess in Vietnam was over the minority Catholic school system (80% Buddhist)failing to be dominate; as much as it was about anything intelligible.

    Here in Saskatoon the new Tommy Douglas High School was built along side a new Holy Whatever. Both campuses are approximately equal in size.

    Naturally this selfish funding-grab and job-grab by one religious sect doesn’t go unnoticed by all the various other solitudes.

    When religious segregationists complain about atheist intellectual challenges to their dogmas they should realize that it is because they are living in a democracy where political maneuvering is noticed.

  2. While the Progressive Conservatives of Ontario won the plurality of electoral districts in the 1985 provincial election, they received a lower proportion of the popular vote than the Liberals effectively as a result of the overrepresentation of rural areas.

    There are publicly-funded Catholic schools in Quebec due to government subsidies (through tuition and preferential tax treatment). There are no denominational school boards in Quebec.

    Approximately a third of Catholic taxpayers in Ontario elect to direct their taxes toward the secular school boards currently, not that this has a direct effect on the funding formula.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Help

WordPress theme: Kippis 1.15