Veronica

This user hasn't shared any biographical information


Posts by Veronica

Letters to the Editor

A resident of Sydney, Nova Scotia, who is a faithful reader of the Cape Breton Post, called my attention to two very different letters to the editor that, I suspect, are responses to this article: “Three Roman Catholic churches to close by July.”  The headline made my day, and this statement made me even happier:

In a document released Sunday, the pastoral planning committee said the declining number of priests, church attendance and financial support, as well as increases in the cost of operating and upgrading aging structures, have forced the diocese to do something.

The fact that the number of priests, church attendance and financial support are declining is good news, and Robert Morley, the writer of this letter to the editor, agrees:

Perhaps part of the reason local churches are closing is that people are beginning to realize that the underpinnings of these edifices are based on falsehoods, myths and fairy tales, if you will.

Today ever-increasing numbers of people are at least exploring in earnest the doctrines and foundations of these various faiths that respectively ask us to suspend any objective analysis of fact and to instead place blind obedience in the belief that this vast universe was created by a being who supposedly knows our every thought and has ordained a divine plan for all of our actions.

Of course, there are those, like John Lyons, who disagree and want to make the broader argument: “All evil isn’t found in churches.” However, Robert Morley is not addressing evil; he is attacking the “falsehoods, myths and fairy tales” that are “the underpinnings” of churches:

Were these churches merely left solely for benign pursuits — such as suppers, festivals, concerts, and places for people to share celebration, grief, education and recreation — they would likely be better populated.

But when church leaders also insist on perpetuating myth as fact, exercising unjustifiable power over the weak and children, and telling all of us how to live with a retinue of ridiculous man-made rules dressed up to appear as divine direction, we should empty their pews and shed their authority as fast as would a mighty river flow down a mountainside. (My emphasis)

Why Adults are Experts at Self-delusion

A short article entitled “High Anxiety: Why adults are experts at self-delusion” in YorkU magazine claims

adults who are uncertain or anxious about one or more areas of their life will often find another domain that acts as a certainty, and will exhibit “irrational conviction’ about that area.  Relationships are a popular outlet for such irrational convictions, as are religious beliefs. (My emphasis)

and

recent studies suggest the tantalizing possibility that goals may be managed so people could be shielded from anxiety . . . thereby removing the need for extreme beliefs. (My Emphasis)

While it is indeed “tantalizing” to believe that if uncertainty and anxiety are eliminated, the need for extreme beliefs, especially religious beliefs, would disappear, I fear the study’s findings are too optimistic.  Unfortunately, people use religion for more than “a balm to ease their anxiety.”

“Delusional Logic”

Do you have trouble indentifying exactly which fallacious argument is being used?  I do, and usually, I resort to Wikipedia to clear up my confusion.  However, the website Something Surprising has posted a useful crib sheet entitled “Delusional Logic” as a guide to the most common fallacies:

Do you spot logical fallacies everywhere you go? Download this unique new pdf file free and start to enjoy the fun.

h/t: Never Thought To Question Why

Enablers

Doug Thomas, president of Secular Connexion Séculaire (SCS), asks the question, “Is There a Line to Draw,” as the Email Topic Discussion for January 23.  Thomas’ question and answer,

So, is there a line to draw between those theists whom we can see are peace-loving individuals and the fanatics? There may be, but it must be a blurry and faded one and it’s time theists stepped up and helped us draw it more clearly.

echo Jerry Coynes’ statement in the concluding paragraph to his post, “A bad week for free speech”:

As usual, Muslims who claim not to be extremists stand by silently while their coreligionists try to dismantle freedom of speech via threats of death.  The silent ones are enablers.

I reserve a special censure for men and women who attend Catholic services, or send their children to Catholic schools, public or private. They are enablers; they enable The Roman Catholic Church to continue its nefarious activities and spread its damaging propaganda.

Coincidence or Physics?

This morning, before settling down to write this post on Jerry Coyne’s article, “Why you don’t really have free will,” I logged on to Why Evolution Is True and found Coyne’s follow up post on his article.  I don’t know whether there is any connection between physics and coincidence, but I like the title, so I used it.

However, my initial reason for writing this post is to call your attention to the article, provide my comments and ask for yours.

In his USA Today article, Coyne clearly states his thesis:

The debate about free will, long the purview of philosophers alone, has been given new life by scientists, especially neuroscientists studying how the brain works. And what they’re finding supports the idea that free will is a complete illusion. (emphasis added)

Coyne goes on to define what he means by free will, and he supports his position with analogy:

Our brains are simply meat computers that, like real computers, are programmed by our genes and experiences to convert an array of inputs into a predetermined output. . . . The ineluctable scientific conclusion is that although we feel that we’re characters in the play of our lives, rewriting our parts as we go along, in reality we’re puppets performing scripted parts written by the laws of physics.

The second sentence is familiar and makes me suspect that Shakespeare preempted Coyne:

All the world’s a stage,

And all the men and women merely players (AYL 2.7.1-2)

 

Coyne presents a convincing argument for the absence of free will, and in his last paragraph, he assures us,

There’s not much downside to abandoning the notion of free will; . . . And there are two upsides.

The only sentence in the whole article that I question is the very last sentence:

With that under our belts, we can go about building a kinder world.

If we don’t have free will, how can we build a “kinder world”?

“Why you don’t really have free will,” deserves a close reading.  After you read it, let’s discuss it.

“Tips on women for Stephen Hawking”

According to Jean Hannah Edelstein at The Guardian,

Professor Stephen Hawking, leading elucidator of the universe, . . . confessed to having his own intellectual kryptonite. Women, he said in an interview with New Scientist, were a “complete mystery” – one that he now devotes much of his time to contemplating.

Edelstein wants to help Hawking understand women:

[J]ust as Hawking was able to explain the universe to those of us who were mystified by it in A Brief History of Time, it is my pleasure to be able to explain women to those who are mystified by us in a A Brief List of Five Obvious Points About Women Using Helpful Scientific Similes.

The five points are clever and fun. Here is number one:

Much like individual fundamental particles, women and men are different, but also the same. Which is to say: women are unique, complicated, intellectual, emotional, sexual. We respire and we digest. Sometimes we are lovely. And sometimes we are horrible. This has less to do with our intrinsic womanliness and more to do with the fact that we are human.

Card Carrying Member

On Friday, January 8, 2012, I received confirmation of my membership in CFI Canada. I also received a membership card. The letter lists the names of the members of the board of directors: all are male, all are white.  Justin Trottier, National Outreach Coordinator; Michael Payton, National Executive Director; and the Board of Directors are very optimistic about the future of CFI Canada:

Apocalypse or not, 2012 is going to be the best year yet for the Centre for Inquiry Canada! We can’t offer you a revelation, but we can unveil our vision for the next year, which grows on the amazing accomplishments your funds have been supporting.

 

Angels

A recent post by Jerry Coyne at Why Evolution Is True discusses the results of an Associated Press-GfK poll that reveals “77% of Americans believe in angels.”  What a coincidence!  Yesterday I was directed to a blog owned by a “Canadian Catholic Writer” who calls herself “Seraphic.” A quick check with Oxford Dictionaries Online confirmed my suspicion that seraphic is an adjective which means, “characteristic of or resembling a seraph or seraphim; angelic” and provides a link to the word seraph:

an angelic being, regarded in traditional Christian angelology as belonging to the highest order of the ninefold celestial hierarchy, associated with light, ardour, and purity.

However, there is nothing angelic about Seraphic’s post on Christopher Hitchens or her coining a new word for atheists. voidist:

Update 2: By the way, I don’t know why atheists (or voidists, since so many supposed atheists nevertheless seem to believe in continued identity after death) think “facing the void” is so much braver than facing the choice between an eternity of love and of damnation.

I am trying to get my head around the word voidist and create an appropriate response to Seraphic.  Please help; send your response to the word voidist to Seraphic or post it below.

PS My initial response to Seraphic is

May the bird of the paradise you believe in fly up your nose.*

*My apologies to Dickens Little Jimmy for distorting his song: “May the Bird of Paradise Fly up Your Nose.”