News

Lahey (finally) stripped of clerical duties

The Holy See in Rome has dismissed Raymond Lahey from the clerical state in what is one of the most serious penalties that the Roman Catholic Church can impose, the Diocese of Antigonish, N.S., said Wednesday.

The decision means Lahey, a former bishop of Antigonish, can no longer work as a cleric nor preside at any religious services or sacraments.

Caught with child porn in 2009 but the church waits until 2012 to strip him of clerical duties?

I suppose he could have been innocent (ignoring that his diocese already paid $15 million to sexual abuse victims) but the church isn’t known for evidence based decision making so if they cared, they could have expedited the process. More likely they waited until the courts were settled and then rubber stamped the eviction to avoid embarrassment. No need to be hasty and do it sooner, since he could have gotten off on a technicality and the church could have him back to work the next day.

via National Post

Leo blog : The Heartland Institute conference billboard in Chicago

Know who else was an atheist??? Hitler! (and other arguments of this type)

Irrespective of whether you accept that the earth is getting hotter, you will hopefully find this attempt to argue against it embarrassingly tragic. It’s amazing to see such a blatant and epic ad hominem fallacy in billboard format. I can only hope that, as the Guardian article says, supporters of heartland.org will pull their funding and distance themselves from such idiocy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More >

Necrophilia in the blogosphere

Is the Egyptian government considering a law that allows people to have sex with their dead spouses?

PZ thinks so
Skepchick is covering it.
Some people are more skeptical.

Or are people primed to believe bad things about people they disagree with?

It seems ridiculous to me, and does have a whiff of propaganda, not to mention fits in with a certain paranoia about Islamists taking over Egypt. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Not so much with blogging it seems. Heheh.

Islamist Books

Here’s another article on how easy it is, apparently, to get radical Islamist literature in Toronto area bookstores.

When one of the store’s managers was asked by a reporter who posed as a customer whether he stocked “Jihad in Islam” — arguably the most radical book of the bunch — he said he hadn’t carried it for years because the RCMP had been to his store to ask questions about why it would carry such a book.
Another manager said the store didn’t carry any of the six books on the reporter’s list.
But within 30 minutes, the reporter found Jihad in Islam and four others of Maududi’s stacked on a bottom shelf in the middle of the store.

Ooops, how did that get there?

Given how easy it is find much worse stuff on the internet these days, and not all of it is even Muslim, I don’t think this rates as a threat to national security, but it does make one think. Not all Muslims want to take over the world, but being vigilant, as opposed to completely paranoid, is certainly the rational thing to do.

Updates and hiatus

I must admit my own failures at maintaining a consistent presence here at Canadian Atheist. I could try to offer a bunch of excuses but it would be far too cliché, let’s just point to life outside the internet and a personal loss of interest in this project for the time being.

So I won’t commit to adding much of my voice here for the next little while.

Which doesn’t mean that I’ve given up blogging. Please check out my personal blog, which features a lot more politics (specifically NDP leadership race coverage) and a new post about CFI Canada – aka the gift that keeps on giving. Hopefully you’ll follow me there but if not I’ll continue to post what I want as I have the motivation to do so.

Accommodating secularism

An interesting turn of events in Morinville, looks like a more acceptable public secular education option may be on the horizon after all.

In January, Hunter and Marjorie Kirsop, another Morinville parent, were rebuffed by the human rights commission. The commission refused to entertain their complaints under the controversial new parental rights clause of the human rights act. That clause gives parents the right to withdraw their children from any instruction involving religion, sexuality, or sexual orientation.

This week, however, the commission informed Hunter and three other parents, Rayann Menard, Tannis Caverly, and Carol Sparks, that their complaints are now being processed under a different part of the act: Section 4, which forbids the denial “to any person or class of persons any goods, services, accommodation or facilities that are customarily available to the public.”

Being heard, is always a good first step.