It’s official, God is a man

At least according to a commitee of American Catholic bishops in response to a group of feminist scholars.

These are questions that theologians like Sister Elizabeth A. Johnson, a Fordham University professor, have been mulling for years. At 69, Sister Johnson is among the pioneers of a generation of feminist scholars who examine how cultural biases among biblical scribes may have led to women’s diminished roles in Western religious traditions, especially the Roman Catholic Church.

Johnson has a good point and any critique of Catholic doctrine is welcomed, especially from within their ranks, but it’s hard to take feminist scholars seriously when they ignore the general misogyny that regularly appears throughout Christian mythology.

Johnson’s book Quest for the Living God: Mapping Frontiers in the Theology of God isn’t high on my reading list but at least I’ll enjoy watching Catholics bicker among themselves.

h/t Holy Post

Catholics on science

Father Robert Barron writes about science for the Catholic Resource Center.

If I can borrow an insight from Fr. George Coyne, a Jesuit priest and astrophysicist, no Biblical text can possibly be “scientific” in nature, since “science,” as we understand it, first emerged some fourteen centuries after the composition of the last Biblical book. The author of Genesis simply wasn’t doing what Newton, Darwin, Einstein, and Hawking were doing; he wasn’t attempting to explain the origins of things in the characteristically modern manner, which is to say, on the basis of empirical observation, testing of hypotheses, marshalling of evidence, and experimentation. Therefore, to maintain that the opening chapters of Genesis are “bad science” is a bit like saying The Iliad is bad history or The Chicago Tribune is not very compelling poetry.

Catholic apologists generally don’t have a problem with science, which is a good thing, but watch out for the follow up.

…through a sheerly generous and peaceful act of speech, he gives rise to the whole of the universe. This means that the most fundamental truth of things – the metaphysics that governs reality at the deepest level – is peace and non-violence. Can you see how congruent this is with Jesus’ great teachings on non-violence and enemy love in the Sermon on the Mount? The Lord is instructing his followers how to live in accord with the elemental grain of the universe.

Blech. Apologists try to make themselves look smart by quoting the benefits of science to get their foot in the door but then they ignore it all and move on to fluffy theology because, to them, meaning is easier to understand.

h/t Holy Post

The Christmas Carol Dilemma

By Andrew Komar

I was raised Catholic, carrying on the intense Catholic tradition of my father. He is an accomplished organist, and he uses his talent primarily as the organist at our parish’s 8 o’clock mass. With our heavy musical background, it was inevitable that my brothers and I would eventually be recruited to play our own instruments during the mass. At the height of it, my brothers would play violin and viola, and I would be on the trumpet. We would accompany our Dad on the organ every Sunday of the year. The little old ladies who came to the 8 o’clock were our biggest fans (because there never seemed to be anyone else up at such an hour), and they would always compliment us.

As any good Catholic knows, Christmas Mass is the biggest mass of the year. It’s when you see the rare but profitable “Christmas-and-Easter” Catholics. The music of Christmas Mass is actually fun to sing, too. My Dad always gets to play music for one of these masses, and my brothers and I are inevitably recruited to help out. The familiarity of the music combined with the thousands of parishioners makes for a hell of an exhilarating performance. Seriously though, who doesn’t like to sing Christmas carols with thousands of people accompanied by a trumpet and a giant pipe organ?

But herein lies the dilemma. Since I’m a writer for this blog, it’s pretty obvious that I don’t buy into any of the associated religious dogma, and I feel the same way as the Crommunist with his looming nightmare. The church is evil, unquestionably, but my participation in the mass has nothing to do with supporting the church; I only want to support my family. I’ve already been hauled to church since returning home for the holidays, but I have not participated in the mass (praying, taking communion, etc). The Christmas masses are coming up, and I have a non-negotiable familial obligation to participate in the music liturgy.

Back in Montreal, my a cappella group took a gig at a synagogue to provide entertainment during one of the nights of Hanukkah. As a member of the group, I had an obligation to participate, even though I disagree with as much of the dogma underlying the Jewish faith as I do Catholic dogma. I don’t think the Jewish community in Montreal is evil any more than I think that my parish in Calgary is, but in both cases I’m using my musical talent to explicitly support a religious community which which I disagree.

So, my dilemma is this: am I a hypocrite for musically participating in the mass? I don’t contribute any money to the church by playing, but I am not exactly opposing it either. As musicians, my family is definitely providing joy and entertainment to thousands of people, but is the fact that this entertainment and joy occurs during mass enough to make the whole thing evil or at least wrong? From a musician’s point of view, is the fact that I personally think it is wrong enough for me to ignore my familial obligation? What do you think?

The Vatican’s shady business

Todays WikiLeaks dump contains a number of communications from the US Embassy in the Vatican, and offers a rare glimpse into what the pope considers interesting.

Here are the releases I’ve found so far. Feel free to link to more in the comments. (Below the fold)

Continue reading

WordPress theme: Kippis 1.15